Webtags (preserving history): Difference between revisions

m
Line 762: Line 762:
The post approach has a few advantages over get:
The post approach has a few advantages over get:
*The parameters are not shown in any query-string, so are not obvious to the person looking over your shoulder, nor do they appear in a history list of sites that the browser has visited.
*The parameters are not shown in any query-string, so are not obvious to the person looking over your shoulder, nor do they appear in a history list of sites that the browser has visited.
*If you fill out a form online, the post approach will be used as the content needs to be kept secure. The get approach may be seen when you are navigating through a web site, and a selection is being remembered.
*If you fill out a form online, the post approach will be used as the content needs to be kept secure.  
*A URL with query-string is restricted in total length (the restriction is dependent on a number of other factors, but might be at something like 1000 characters in total), so GET comes with a restriction on how many parameters can be specified; POST can handle much longer requests.
**The get approach may be seen when you are navigating through a web site, and a selection is being remembered.
*The POST approach can handle very long requests and return a lot of information.
**In contrast, a URL with query-string is restricted in total length (the restriction is dependent on a number of other factors, but might be at something like 1000 characters in total), so GET comes with a restriction on how many parameters can be specified.


here is an example text file with some web tags in it, let us store it in '''process.txt''':
here is an example text file with some web tags in it, let us store it in '''process.txt''':
5,838

edits