Theoretical background on pwsFWI - Revision history

HansR: /* Word of thanks */

2021-04-16T18:47:13Z

Word of thanks

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 16 April 2021
Line 110:		Line 110:
	H/T for the original testers and contributors of information who worked with me to achieve the final result.		H/T for the original testers and contributors of information who worked with me to achieve the final result.

	You can find the listing in the blog : [https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/2019/09/21/sites-which-carry-the-fire-weather-index-pwsfwi/ Sites which carry the Fire Weather Index pwsFWI]. Most of them still carry the Fire Weather Index page but because updating the software is not so very important for them, they fell of the map which replaced the list and became part of CumulusUtils. Once they upgrade they will automatically be shown on the map again.		You can find the listing in the blog : [https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/2019/09/21/sites-which-carry-the-fire-weather-index-pwsfwi/ Sites which carry the Fire Weather Index pwsFWI]. Most of them still carry the Fire Weather Index page but because updating the software is not so very important for them, they fell of the [[Map - Users of CumulusUtils\|map]] which replaced the list and became part of CumulusUtils. Once they upgrade they will automatically be shown on the [[Map - Users of CumulusUtils\|map]] again.

	== References ==		== References ==

HansR: /* Quenching and smoothing the fire weather index */

2021-04-13T15:10:03Z

Quenching and smoothing the fire weather index

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:10, 13 April 2021
Line 105:		Line 105:
	#If on one day an amount of rain between 1 and 5 mm has fallen, '''that day''' is skipped so that its value of pwsFWI does not contribute to the average of the five days		#If on one day an amount of rain between 1 and 5 mm has fallen, '''that day''' is skipped so that its value of pwsFWI does not contribute to the average of the five days
	#if on one day an amount of more than 5 mm has fallen, '''that day and the next day''' are skipped so that their values of pwsFWI do not contribute to the average of the the five days		#if on one day an amount of more than 5 mm has fallen, '''that day and the next day''' are skipped so that their values of pwsFWI do not contribute to the average of the the five days
	And finally a minor contribution, a fine tuning, is made to the pwsFWI by the length of the dry period in days because long dry periods take all moisture from deep within thick wood. Thick wood however does not easily ignite by a spark, not even when it is dry.		And finally a minor contribution, a fine tuning, is made to the pwsFWI by adding the length of the dry period in days to pwsFWI because long dry periods take all moisture from deep within thick wood. Thick wood however does not easily ignite by a spark, not even when it is dry.

	== Word of thanks ==		== Word of thanks ==

HansR: /* Some reasoning */

2021-04-13T15:01:02Z

Some reasoning

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 13 April 2021
Line 81:		Line 81:
	== Some reasoning ==		== Some reasoning ==

	The whole process of evaporation and drying is implicit. I will not try to quantify the waterbalance exactly which would result in a quantification of the [[Charts_-_Misc_charts#Daily_EVT_.28Evapotranspiration.29\|Evapotranspiration]]. Evaporation is an extremely complex process ~~See~~ some pages on the ~~wiki~~<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaporation Evaporation], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrology_(agriculture) Hydrology (agriculture)] and the [http://www.fao.org/3/X0490E/x0490e00.htm FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56].</ref>, which is far beyond the scope of a fire weather index. ~~Even~~ ~~professionally~~, as it is influenced by vegetation, crop, soil etc… In short, the whole environment. That would be a bit too much although I think in principle it can be done.		The whole process of evaporation and drying is implicit. I will not try to quantify the waterbalance exactly which would result in a quantification of the [[Charts_-_Misc_charts#Daily_EVT_.28Evapotranspiration.29\|Evapotranspiration]]. Evaporation is an extremely complex process, too much for this wiki page, see some pages on the wikipedia <ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaporation Evaporation], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrology_(agriculture) Hydrology (agriculture)] and the [http://www.fao.org/3/X0490E/x0490e00.htm FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56].</ref>, which is far beyond the scope of a fire weather index. But even for professionals it is a complex phenomenon, as it is influenced by vegetation, crop, soil etc… In short, the whole environment. That would be a bit too much although I think in principle it can be done.

	High VPD implies also high evaporation.		High VPD implies also high evaporation.
Line 89:		Line 89:
	Wind, although not a direct factor in igniting fire, contributes very much to the drying process and after ignition, it contributes to the propagation. Strong winds will quickly create dangerous fire weather. The longer the period of dry (and strong) wind and high temperatures, the drier the fuel will be and the easier it will ignite.		Wind, although not a direct factor in igniting fire, contributes very much to the drying process and after ignition, it contributes to the propagation. Strong winds will quickly create dangerous fire weather. The longer the period of dry (and strong) wind and high temperatures, the drier the fuel will be and the easier it will ignite.

	So, relative humidity (fraction), wind (in km/h) and temperature (in °C) are the measurements used for the daily calculation as shown above. Furthermore the effect of the duration of dry and (possibly windy) weather needs to be taken into account and that is done through a process of testing and adjusting (a kind of calibration) until the output delivers consistent warning levels comparable with experience and existing fire weather indices.		So, relative humidity (fraction), wind (in km/h) and temperature (in °C) are the measurements used for the daily calculation as shown above. Furthermore the effect of the duration of dry and (possibly windy) weather needs to be taken into account and that is done through a process of testing and adjusting (a kind of calibration) until the output delivers consistent warning levels comparable with experience and existing fire weather indices.

	== Quenching and smoothing the fire weather index ==		== Quenching and smoothing the fire weather index ==

HansR: /* Humidity – the science */

2021-04-13T14:57:07Z

Humidity – the science

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 13 April 2021
Line 71:		Line 71:
	<math>P_{Sat}\ {{=}}\ {A} \times {e}^{\frac{{B}\times{T}} {({C}\ +\ {T})} }</math>		<math>P_{Sat}\ {{=}}\ {A} \times {e}^{\frac{{B}\times{T}} {({C}\ +\ {T})} }</math>

	Where A = 6.112, B= 17.62 and C= 243.12 are the coefficients of the August-Roche-Magnus equation as found in the Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods <ref>[https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/IMOP/CIMO-Guide.html Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (WMO-No. 8, CIMO Guide)], In Chapter 4. Measurement Of Humidity, Annex 4.B. Formulae For The Computation Of Measures Of Humidity.</ref>~~. In Chapter 4. Measurement Of Humidity, Annex 4.B. Formulae For The Computation Of Measures Of Humidity~~. P<sub>sat</sub> in hPa and T in °C. The coefficients are slightly different from the ones found in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapour_pressure_of_water#Approximation_formulas Wikipedia].		Where A = 6.112, B= 17.62 and C= 243.12 are the coefficients of the August-Roche-Magnus equation as found in the Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods <ref>[https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/IMOP/CIMO-Guide.html Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (WMO-No. 8, CIMO Guide)], In Chapter 4. Measurement Of Humidity, Annex 4.B. Formulae For The Computation Of Measures Of Humidity.</ref>. P<sub>sat</sub> in hPa and T in °C. The coefficients are slightly different from the ones found in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapour_pressure_of_water#Approximation_formulas Wikipedia].

	With this estimator for P<sub>Sat</sub> we can work straight on to an FWI for personal weather stations (which from here on I will call pwsFWI or rough pwsFWI).		With this estimator for P<sub>Sat</sub> we can work straight on to an FWI for personal weather stations (which from here on I will call pwsFWI or rough pwsFWI).
Line 77:		Line 77:
	<math>{pwsFWI}\ {{=}}\ {VPD} \times {Windspeed}</math>		<math>{pwsFWI}\ {{=}}\ {VPD} \times {Windspeed}</math>

	The VPD must be seen as the largest driving factor in evaporation and as such in the drying of the fuel(s). For the Meteorological variables in the calculation per day, the daily high or total (T, Wind, Rain) or daily low (RH) values are taken.		The VPD must be seen as the largest driving factor in evaporation and as such in the drying of the fuel(s). For the Meteorological variables in the calculation per day, the daily high or total (T, Wind, Rain) or daily low (RH) values are taken.

	== Some reasoning ==		== Some reasoning ==

HansR: Finishing touch

2021-04-13T10:07:49Z

Finishing touch

Show changes

HansR: /* References */

2021-04-13T08:05:19Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:05, 13 April 2021
Line 79:		Line 79:
	== References ==		== References ==
	<references />		<references />


			[[Category:CumulusUtils]]

HansR at 17:59, 12 April 2021

2021-04-12T17:59:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 12 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:PwsFWI legend.jpg\|center\|none\|PwsFWI legend.jpg]]		[[File:PwsFWI legend.jpg\|center\|none\|PwsFWI legend.jpg]]
	'''Still under construction'''~~<big>Big text~~</big>		<big>'''Still under construction'''</big>
	== Introduction ==		== Introduction ==
	{\|align=right		{\|align=right

HansR: /* Introduction */

2021-04-12T17:59:14Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 12 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:PwsFWI legend.jpg\|center\|none\|PwsFWI legend.jpg]]		[[File:PwsFWI legend.jpg\|center\|none\|PwsFWI legend.jpg]]
			'''Still under construction'''<big>Big text</big>
	== Introduction ==		== Introduction ==
	{\|align=right		{\|align=right

HansR at 17:57, 12 April 2021

2021-04-12T17:57:26Z

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 Relative Humidity is defined as the ratio of the vapor pressure  and the saturation vapor pressure:
-  <math>{RH} {{=}} \frac{P}{P_{Sat}} </math>
+  <math>{RH}\ {{=}}\ \frac{P}{P_{Sat}} </math> (1)
 Relative humidity is measured directly by the weather station and as such is easy to use. However, the point is that the relative humidity does not cover the whole story. The same RH will require another pressure to become saturated at different temperatures. In other words: at lower temperatures, the same RH requires less evaporation to saturate than at higher temperatures. Or, if looked at a single temperature, the drive to evaporate (to dry the fuel), is given by the difference between the current vapor pressure and the saturated vapor pressure. We call this the vapor pressure deficit (VPD)<ref name="HDW" />. In formula:
 == References ==

HansR at 15:22, 12 April 2021

2021-04-12T15:22:09Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Introduction ==
  {|align=right
   |__TOC__
   |}
 The Fire Weather Index for a personal weather station, in short '''pwsFWI''', is probably one of the most complex modules of ''CumulusUtils''. Not so much for the calculations, which once you know what to do are not that complex, but more for the interpretation and understanding of what is shown. This Wiki article will show the science background to pwsFWI.
@@ Line 13: / Line 11: @@
 On my ([https://cumulus.hosiene.co.uk/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=9016 HansR]) blog you may read [https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/tag/pwsfwi/ several posts] on the pwsFWI but also on the other fire weather indices in the world notably [https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/2019/08/11/fire-weather-the-canadian-fwi/ the Canadian FWI]. This complex FWI is used in many places but it is so complex that it is not summarized in equations, but referenced by the articles. The complexity of this FWI was one of the main reasons to create pwsFWI. Other fire indexes such as the Ångström index and the Chandler Burning Index, though often seen on amateur weather sites, have been looked at but these are not discriminating enough.
-After describing different indices for fire weather, in  reverse order.<ref name="FWI">[https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/2019/08/11/fire-weather-the-canadian-fwi/ The Canadian FWI], some text</ref> (with longer literature list), At the end of the heatwave, The Ångström index and the FMI index and The Chandler Burning Index, I conclude the following:
+After describing different indices for fire weather, in  reverse order <ref name="FWI">[https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/2019/08/11/fire-weather-the-canadian-fwi/ The Canadian FWI], (Contains a longer literature list)</ref>, <ref>[https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/2019/07/27/fire-weather-at-the-end-of-the-heatwave/ At the end of the heatwave]</ref>, <ref>[https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/2019/07/10/fire-weather-the-angstrom-index-and-the-fmi-index/ The Ångström index and the FMI index]</ref> and <ref>[https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl/wp/2019/07/08/the-chandler-burning-index/ The Chandler Burning Index]</ref>, I concluded the following:
 <references />